Saturday, February 11, 2023

CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE ABOUT LEGAL DEFORMITIES IN LAS CRUCES

FLASH: City Attorney Jennifer Vega has left office.  Until recently, almost no one knew that she had departed in early November, although the city had posted the opening on 22 December.  The Mayor, a Councilor, or the City Manager may (or not) have noted her departure in a City Council meeting, but, apparently, neither Justin Garcia nor Damien D. Willis, Sun-News reporters, noticed or investigated her absence from the dais.  So the paper failed to report her departure either by resignation (letter submitted) or firing (statement issued) and the reasons for it.  Neither Councilor Kasandra Gandara nor News Director Jessica Onsurez has replied to my questions or comments on Vega’s exit.  Not surprisingly, Vega’s covert departure, once discovered, prompts rumor and speculation.

 

Rumor first.  The 2-year delay in filling the position of Independent Auditor reflected a conflict between Vega and a well-qualified and likely successor.   The reasons for the delay were flimsy.  When further delay became impossible, Vega quit before a rival and potential threat arrived.

 

Speculations second.  One, Vega had something to hide.  Given public knowledge of her successful whistleblower lawsuit, with its $500,000 settlement, and personal knowledge of her as a liar and libeler, I can easily imagine her capable of subversive or nefarious behavior.  Vega skedaddled before a civil or criminal case could be filed.

 

Two, the City had something to hide, like Vega’s incompetent, corrupt, even criminal, conduct now exposing the city to legal risks.  Vega got a pre-emptive settlement, signed a “non-disclosure agreement,” and agreed to skip town to save it more trouble and money.

 

If either or both of these speculations were true, the incoming Independent Auditor is likely to have much to do but will encounter strong resistance from the political powers-that-be because the damage to the city, financial and reputational, would be substantial.

 

Meanwhile, just a week ago, Peter Goodman’s column “Amelia Baca Is Still Dead – Authorities Are Still Silent” appeared in the digital but, unusually, not the print edition of the Sun-News.  Given his previous column on the killing, with its misplaced sympathy for the good people on both sides, I am impressed that Goodman has finally, powerfully confronted the shameful performance of the legal community in this case.  I hope for no unusual omission if he ever again speaks truth to power.

 

Goodman’s column deserves wide distribution.  Yet I have three quibbles: the phrase “In his defense,” the word “curses,” and the phrase “our collective state of mind.”  What Officer Cosper first believed cannot defend his later conduct in the situation, especially after he got information and advice from the family.  “Curses” euphemizes his angry, profanity-laced, five-times-shouted order to “drop the fucking knives” in his encounter with his demented, unaggressive victim and thus fails to provide the proper perspective for viewing his killing.  How “our collective state of mind” bears on what went wrong escapes me, for I do not subscribe to Jungian psychology or Zen Buddhism.


 

Amelia Baca Is Still Dead - Authorities Are Still Silent

Peter Goodman (5 Feb)

 

Amelia Baca is still dead.

 

She was killed April 16th, 2022, by Las Cruces Police Officer, Jared Cosper. He’s back on duty since November, although not on patrol.

 

The city government has still not explained why Cosper is back on the job. The city has also never explained why the first video the city showed us was a propaganda piece edited to defend the officer – not to share the facts and seek the right course of action. Apparently Cosper’s conduct was acceptable to the city administration.

 

Prosecutors have still not ventured to say whether this killing was a crime.

 

If you’ve seen the video of the shooting, you have an opinion. The video is clear and vivid.

 

It shouldn’t be that hard to watch the video and interviews of Cosper and the few witnesses, review his training, his file, LCPD practices, and the law, and decide whether or not to charge him with a crime.

 

The local task force finished its investigation June 21. Our DA said a decision “could take several days,” then punted to the AG’s Office on July 31.

 

Hector Balderas accomplished nothing.

 

Our new AG, Raul Torrez, I know slightly and respect. Recently Bernalillo County District Attorney, he has ample expertise. I urge him to provide us some response to this very significant public question this month.

 

Cosper approaches the house, gun drawn. In his defense, he had reason to believe Sra. Baca, 76, was demented and might have threatened someone. She was a diminutive Mexican-American lady who spoke no English. As he arrives, he tells everyone to come outside. Her daughter and granddaughter emerge, not appearing frightened. The granddaughter urges Cosper to “be gentle with her.”

 

Amelia Baca stands in the doorway. She’s frightened or confused. Her left hand holds two knives, pointed downward. She never raises either or makes a threatening motion. Nor does she drop them. Cosper shouts and curses. She knows no English. Cosper attempts no Spanish. The other ladies are trying to explain something to him.

 

Ms. Baca does not rush toward him. She probably feels closer to Cosper than she looks on wide-angle video. He has ample room to step back. She seems to take a half-step into the doorway. He fires a shot into her chest.

 

If I seem to be arguing the prosecutor’s case, I’m not. These are basic facts. What they mean legally is for the AG’s Office to say, and then, perhaps, prove to a judge or jury. (If conviction appears even slightly more likely than acquittal, the prosecution should charge Cosper.)

 

I do believe that something went awfully wrong here. Whether or not Cosper’s training, experience, and state of mind insulate him from criminal penalties, something is damned wrong. The problem could be LCPD hiring or training, the LCPD administration, Cosper himself, our collective state of mind, or all of these. We must identify and fix what’s wrong.

 

Not making a clear public statement is a huge insult to Amelia Baca and her family. It’s a huge insult to you and me, and to the male Hispanic lawyer who told me he’d be afraid to report anything to the police. The silence is delaying serious efforts at improvements. Not meaningfully addressing the disproportionate number of questionable killings by Las Cruces police is an insult to all officers and citizens, particularly citizens of color.

 

City and Attorney-General’s Office: please stop insulting us. Honor Sra. Baca. Do your jobs.

No comments:

Post a Comment