Friday, June 13, 2025

LOCAL VIPS DISLIKE ME; SO WHAT?

 The deplorable attitudes of the governing toward the governed in Las Cruces has been a theme of many of my blogs.  Whereas those blogs discussed others, this blog focuses on the contrast between responses to me by various VIPs in Las Cruces and VIPs in McLean and Fairfax County, Virginia.  The purpose of the contrast is not to elicit sympathy because local VIPs do not like or respect me, but to explain why I feel sorry for Las Cruces that its VIPs do so little to elevate the quality of the community and its political life.

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

REFLECTIONS ON RECENT AND NEAR-TERM POLITICAL EVENTS

The past few days have been quite remarkable, among the most portentous in American history.

 

President Trump has resorted to federalizing a state national guard over the objections of California Governor Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.  Doubling down on Trump’s uncalled-for action, Defense Secretary Hegseth has sent a Marine battalion from its 29 Palms base.  They are doing two things in Los Angeles: almost nothing because there is almost nothing for them to do and inflaming the situation.  This military incursion into America’s second largest city sends a message to the rest of the country—Trump’s order is not limited to California—that militarized occupation and political repression are coming for majority-Democratic cities (mostly in the North).  America has seen nothing like this since the Reconstruction Era for two decades after the Civil War.  During that period, northern armies served to protect those working to promote democratic government and incorporate freed blacks into it, from guerilla groups, including the Ku Klux Klan.  Now, 160 years later, the “South” is rising again.

 

Trump’s military parade in Washington, D.C., is unprecedented.  There have been both major and minor military parades before, after the conclusion of major wars, in honor of local military events, or in tribute to veterans.  I know of none which involved a display of massive weapons like tanks.  The parade occurs on Flag Day, on the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, and on Trump’s 79th birthday.  He has made it clear that no one will be allowed to spoil his parade by protesting him, its militaristic message, its multi-million-dollar cost, and its damage to roads and malls.  Indeed, he has threatened protesters, peaceful or not, with a very forceful response.  No TACO moment: the military will inflict injuries or fatalities on protesters.

 

The violation of protesters’ First Amendment rights to speak and assemble in such a situation will raise difficult questions with undemocratic answers.  Thanks to the Supreme Court, Trump cannot be charged because he has immunity from his “official” acts.  A claim can be made that presiding over a parade is not an official act within the scope of presidential responsibilities, but it is not likely to be persuasive to the six Republican regressive justices.  Moreover, Trump would likely pardon those charged for constitutional violations.  Given his displays of disrespect for the courts and his resistance to court orders, Trump is likely to disregard court decisions not to his liking.  Courts might issue legal or constitutional rulings to restrain him, but to no avail; fine opinions, except for the record, will be ignored.  Although the six GOP SCOTUS justices, especially Chief Justice John Roberts, corrupted the court to achieve “conservative” objectives, Trump’s public contempt will still dishonor it and thereby humiliate these feckless justices.

 

Many hope that the elections of 2026 and 2028 will enable the country to recover from the ruination which Trump has visited upon it.  But there will be no elections.  Trump knows that his policies have made him far more unpopular than he has ever been, that the opposition to him is growing is size and intensity, and that he has endangered the strength, perhaps even the survival, of the Republican Party.  His increasingly authoritarian conduct can mean only one thing: he and the party cannot remain in power after another election or two.  Current Republican efforts to disenfranchise or hinder voters will continue, but he and the party will hold the cancellation of the election in reserve if those efforts do not give them assurance of electoral success.

 

I offer this advice to all as a public service announcement.


ICE Encounters.png

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

IMMIGRANTS ARE THE NEW JEWS

During the Tsarist-prompted pogroms in the late nineteenth century, District police came into a small village to find and arrest Jews.  This small village (I have forgotten its name) was a farming village with a general store run by and lived in by its only Jewish family.  The store sold groceries, clothing, supplies, hardware, etc.; the owner also provided credit to the residents in hard times.  When the police whisked them away, the town was stricken.  The mayor and other town officials decided to go to the district headquarters some distance away to plead for the family’s return.  In so many words, the mayor said, “we don’t like Jews any more than the Tsar does, but they are our Jews, and we want them back.”  The police released them, everyone returned to the village, and the villagers celebrated.

 

The story is not typical of the Tsarist campaign against Jewish Russians.  Several hundred thousand Jews fled Russia.  In doing so, they gave substance to the Zionist movement for a Jewish homeland.  One result, until recent abominations under Benjamin Netanyahu’s rule, was that these immigrants to the British Mandate (i.e., Palestine), created a thriving, modern state now with an educated and skilled populace, and an economy based on cutting-edge technologies.  Meanwhile, Russia languishes in a past which is always its present: a despotic state, a repressed people, a weak economy, and a reliance on aggression to unify its demoralized population.

 

Thirty years or so later, Hitler exploited the latent antisemitism of most Germans.  He roused the populace by blaming Jews for Germany’s defeat and post-war suffering, the weakness of the Weimar Republic, and the “cosmopolitizing” of Germany.  Although Jews had been residents of German lands for centuries and had been full citizens of the modern German state when its lands were unified in 1871, Hitler roused and made virulent the latent antisemitism of Christian Germans and turned them against Jewish Germans.  By then, Jews had established themselves in the legal and medical professions and the universities.  Many of Germany’s brightest scientists, including Han Bethe, Max Born, Albert Einstein, James Franck, Klaus Fuchs, Fritz Haber, Hans Krebs, John von Neuman, Rudolf Peierls, Erwin Schrodinger, Leo Szilard, Edward Teller were Jews (names italicized).  Had Hitler not attacked the Jews, many of these scientists would have helped Germany develop the atomic bomb which they helped develop for the United States.

 

For Trump, immigrants—he thinks mostly of Hispanics--serve much the same purpose.  He regards them variously as criminals, degenerates, lunatics, animals, and pollutants to American blood (shades of Dr. Strangelove), and claims that they are invading this country, swarming through cities, and eating peoples’ pets.  His purpose is to set immigrants with or without criminal records, with or without documentation, apart from other residents, as outcasts who should be deported, as unpersons (the German word was “untermenschen”) who do not have constitutional rights like due process, free speech, assembly, and petition.  To deport them, he uses state power to arrest in violent ways and “disappear” those who appear to be immigrants regardless of their legal status; separate them from their families, and children from their parents; transport them to places unknown to them; isolate and incarcerate them under inhumane conditions; and deny them access to attorneys.  All of these actions are conducted quite openly, first, to intimidate potential victims and, second, to inure and secure acceptance by others to such abuses of the law and the Constitution.  The last thing which Trump wants is for the country to welcome, accept, advance, and benefit from immigrants and their contributions.  Why?  They defeat his desire for a white, Christian, male-dominated America.

 

But immigrants are not Trump’s only targets for purging from the populace those whom he regards as undesirable.  A special notice must be taken of the LGBTQ+ people, whom Trump is also targeting (as Hitler targeted them in Nazi Germany).  And there are many others: Muslims, Sikhs, those of other smaller minority groups, and, of course, Jews.  Trump also wishes to debase those whom he cannot incarcerate or deport, like women, whose integrity and autonomy he wishes to end, whose participation in society he wishes to throttle, and whose vote he wishes to eliminate.  By requiring an exact match of current and birth certificate names, the SAVE Act might disenfranchise married women who took their husband’s name.

 

Such is the context of the raids and kidnappings by DHS, FBI, and ICE agents happening from coast to coast.  All are thugs, masked, heavily armed, and aggressive; they are provocateurs who intend to prompt violence and permit their greater reactive violence, justify criminal charges, and terrorize communities into acquiescence.  (I would like to have a bumper sticker which reads, “Melt ICE.).  These agencies are also securing the support of state and local police forces.  Two interesting questions about the LCPD are why a recent (30 May) Albuquerque Journal story about sanctuary cities in New Mexico did not mention Las Cruces and why Police Chief Jeremy Story requested City Council to seek state funding for five—five!—SWAT vehicles.  (I asked him about their capabilities and equipment, but received no answer.  When Cassie McClure asked for that information on my behalf, she received no answer—itself a curious fact.  When I asked her why she voted to approve his request, her answer was that she accepted that he must have had a good reason for it.  Due diligence, anyone?)

 

One line of resistance to Trump (and his evil angel, Stephen Miller, ironically, a Jew) is respect for others and a recognition that, as Joyce Vance reminds us, “we’re in this together.”  So the words of Martin Niemöller are worth recalling:

 

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

 

Substitute “immigrants” for “socialists” and “LGBTW+” for “trade unionists,” and you have a message updated to match the current threat to American democracy and freedom.

Saturday, June 7, 2025

POLITICAL ACQUIESCENCE REFLECTS NEW MEXICO’S HISTORICAL LEGACY

      The longer I live in Las Cruces (since 2007), the more dismayed I am by the conduct of its residents and their elected representatives.  These residents’ primary interests—family, friends, and football—are divorced from larger concerns about the community or city and thus give members of City Council the latitude to do as they please.  Knowing the historical context of this conduct, I should not be dismayed.  For this social solipsism goes back at least as far as the pueblo days, when each pueblo lived independently of others.  As a result, they did not band together to resist the Spanish conquistadors in the sixteenth century.  Decades later, they did unite in the successful Pueblo Revolt of 1680, but, by 1692, only twelve years later, they had dissolved their bands of unity.  Spanish armies returned and repressed Pueblo residents to a submissiveness ever after a part of their cultural heritage and of New Mexico’s.  It paralleled the submissiveness which characterized the underclasses of Spanish society at the time.  Such is the historical legacy of today’s Hispanics who constitute the majority of the Las Cruces populace and about half the population of New Mexico.  It is also a major cultural influence affecting non-Hispanics throughout the state, in which acquiescence to dominating officials is characteristic.

Friday, May 30, 2025

TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME–THE INFECTION SPREADS

     The President, his lackeys, MAGA supporters, and followers apply the phrase Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) as one of disparagement to the rest of us, but it properly should apply, as I shall apply it, to them.  Indeed, as is typical of the TDS set, almost everything which they say is the reverse of the proper description of the state of affairs.  Shortly before the 2024 election, The Economist, a center-right weekly, declared the U.S. economy “the envy of the world”; shortly after that election, as reported in The Guardian, a center-left weekly, Trump declared that it “went to hell” under Biden.

     Total reversals of the truth are one thing; various perversions of the truth—falsehoods, distortions, misrepresentations, false imputations, malign insinuations, linguistic smears, etc.—which characterize the administration’s public communications are another.  To these and other rhetorical crimes, Karoline Leavitt, the White Press Secretary, adds a gratuitous snootiness and snideness which, all together, perfectly capture the administration’s ethos.  Ironically, in her 5 May letter to Alan Gerber, President of Harvard University, Linda McMahon, Secretary of Education, served as a model of not only the foregoing perversions, but also the semi-literacy of administration officials.  The letter has been widely mocked for its partisan stupidity and grammatical lapses quite apart from its factual infelicities.


So it is no surprise that, as I write today, Memorial Day, Trump demonstrated his vulgarity in an early morning, all-caps tweet on Truth Social:

 

HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY TO ALL, INCLUDING THE SCUM THAT SPENT THE LAST FOUR YEARS TRYING TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY THROUGH WARPED RADICAL LEFT MINDS, WHO ALLOWED 21,000,000 MILLION PEOPLE TO ILLEGALLY ENTER OUR COUNTRY, MANY OF THEM BEING CRIMINALS AND THE MENTALLY INSANE,THROUGH AN OPEN BORDER THAT ONLY AN INCOMPETENT PRESIDENT WOULD APPROVE, AND THROUGH JUDGES WHO ARE ON A MISSION TO KEEP MURDERERS, DRUG DEALERS, RAPISTS, GANG MEMBERS, AND RELEASED PRISONERS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD, IN OUR COUNTRY SO THEY CAN ROB, MURDER, AND RAPE AGAIN — ALL PROTECTED BY THESE USA HATING JUDGES WHO SUFFER FROM AN IDEOLOGY THAT IS SICK, AND VERY DANGEROUS FOR OUR COUNTRY. HOPEFULLY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND OTHER GOOD AND COMPASSIONATE JUDGES THROUGHOUT THE LAND, WILL SAVE US FROM THE DECISIONS OF THE MONSTERS WHO WANT OUR COUNTRY TO GO TO HELL. BUT FEAR NOT, WE HAVE MADE GREAT PROGRESS OVER THE LAST 4 MONTHS, AND AMERICA WILL SOON BE SAFE AND GREAT AGAIN! AGAIN, HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY, AND GOD BLESS AMERICA! 

 

The characterization of “the federal judiciary as ‘USA hating’ and ‘monsters’ is particularly twisted; many members of the courts are Trump- or other Republican-appointed judges.  If taken seriously, the derogatory words raise the question why he and other Republican presidents nominated such judges in the first place.  When Trump goes on to claim that Biden wanted all manner of felons to enter the country and any number of judges wanted to keep them in the country so that they can repeat their felonies, he departs from the reality about a lifelong public official and educated, dedicated judges in favor of comic-book villains.  Such a mind invents “the scum that spent the last four years trying to destroy our country through warped radical left minds”—which leaves the rest of us wondering who is that “scum” whom he includes in his “Happy Memorial Day” wishes to all.  As CNN points out, “In the United States, Memorial Day honors those who died while serving in the armed forces; due to the holiday’s grave significance, it’s largely considered taboo to wish someone a “Happy Memorial Day.”  (Not in Las Cruces, where such greetings are an irksome commonplace; just how happy do people think the holiday happy to those honoring by remembering their sacrifice and their loss?  But they do not think.)

 

Trump the vulgarian’s rhetoric reached a remarkable low in the graduation address which he delivered in the formal ceremony at West Point.  Missing was his derogatory language, unless one includes his short diversion on “trophy brides,” a phrase self-consciously acknowledged, and the dangers which they pose (Melania, were you paying attention?).  Everything reflected his narcissistic reflections on episodes in his life which he thought apt for soon-to-be commissioned cadets dedicated, not to self-enrichment, but to public service.  Nothing addressed the principles, values, and aspirations of such service to which the cadets would commit themselves.  A more dispiriting speech was not possible.  Trump’s applause-expectant pauses were filled with a little perfunctory clapping or silence; the cadets were having none of it.

 

The hallmark of authoritarianism is its assault on reality in all of its dimensions: political, of course, but also intellectual, scientific, economic, social, and cultural.  Accordingly, Trump’s administration is attacking the media, students and faculty protesting and deemed likely to protest, major universities, and government agencies conducting basic research in medicine and other fields.  It cannot tolerate dissent or truth, which, aside from any resistance to its application of power, resides in a different  reality.  Part of that assault reflects a lack of respect for dissenting citizens as evinced, minimally, in personal abuse by derogatory insinuation or assertion.

 

Such was the practice of three holdovers from the six women councilors of the previous Council at the 19 May City Council meeting: Johana Bencomo, Becky Corran, and Yvonne Flores.  In their statements or insinuations, they attacked opponents of Realize Las Cruces who, they asserted without evidence, lied about, misrepresented, or distorted the truth, and implied were racist.  (I assume that Mayor Eric Enriquez agreed with the women because he did not enforce Council’s rules about respectful speech and conduct.).  Their abusive, disrespectful rejection of dissenters had the usual problems which such authoritarianism has: it rejected alternative ideas about reality and had no Plan B if its ideas about reality fail.

 

There is a larger context to this outburst of officials’ incivility.  At the few Council meetings which I have attended since that January 2022, I have heard several speakers deplore the deterioration in the quality of City Council.  They spoke to a Council of all female councilors.  At the time, I blogged, “I expect the male mayor to dominate and direct the six female councilors.  I expect that inoffensive mediocrity and mendacity by six female councilors to merely replace the past inoffensive mediocrity and mendacity by six male councilors.  I expect that such equivalence—call it equality, if you will—to make no difference to ordinary folk, much less be a cause for citizens to celebrate.  Still, I hope for better than I expect.”

 

Only in two respects do I find the all-women councilors different from the all-male councilors.  The women seem less able to address difficult topics (police reform, Public Works waste, antisemitism), they seem to defer to male leadership or groupthink, and they are less temperate in their language toward citizens whose views on important issues differ from theirs.  An excellent example is Tessa Abeyta’s intemperate attack on Peter Goodman, who was advocating for a citizen police review board, at a Council meeting some years ago.

 

Some columnists/commentators regard this conduct by councilors as worthy only of an apologetic footnote.  They simply do not appreciate that disparaging citizens and rejecting their dissents, with their possibility of reality and the truth, out of hand is dangerous.  What if Trump’s tariffs and his “big, beautiful bill” have dire consequences?  What are his fallback positions?  How does the country recover from the damage, much of it long-term?  What if Realize Las Cruces falters or fails?  How will the damage be undone?  Short of demolition, what does the city do about permanent buildings?  What if it divides the community into enduring hostile camps, today’s losers blaming today’s winners?  Do city councilors and city staff have a Plan B?

 

My point is a simple one.  Rhetoric is a clue to the political character of officials.  Politicians who are disrespectful to or abusive of citizens are also incipiently or currently authoritarian.  In their misuse of power by denigrating dissenters and dismissing their positions, they place the societies which they rule in self-harm’s way.  Trump Derangement Syndrome has spread to Las Cruces.

Friday, May 23, 2025

COUNCILORS’ ATTACKS ON CITIZEN PETITIONERS SEEKING A REFERENDUM HAVE RACIST INSINUATIONS

# NOTE: Democracy Docket (23 May) reports on Republican efforts in several states to hinder direct democracy.  Lots of people otherwise regarded as Americans do not like democracy and do not respect those who do like it.